1. Richter AE, Arruda AO, Sohn W,
et al. : Incidence of caries lesions among patients treated with comprehensive orthodontics.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139:657-664, 2011.
2. Crosby DR, Alexander CG : The occurrence of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 95:457-461, 1989.
3. Schirmer UR, Wiltshire WA : Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 112:676-680, 1997.
4. Motohashi N, Kuroda T : A 3D computer-aided design system applied to diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.
Eur J Orthod, 21:263-274, 1999.
5. Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA : Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.
Angle Orthod, 73:301-306, 2003.
6. Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A : Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review.
Orthod Craniofac Res, 14:1-16, 2011.
7. Rossini G, Parrini S, Debernardi CL,
et al. : Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes: A systematic review.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149:161-170, 2016.
8. Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Fischer JR,
et al. : A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method.
Angle Orthod, 71:351-357, 2001.
9. Santoro M, Galkin S, Cangialosi TJ,
et al. : Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124:101-105, 2003.
10. Stevens DR, Flores Mir C, Nebbe B,
et al. : Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129:794-803, 2006.
11. Mullen SR, Martin CA, Gladwin M,
et al. : Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132:346-352, 2007.
12. Goracci C, Franchi L, Ferrari M,
et al. : Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence.
Eur J Orthod, 38:422-428, 2016.
13. Grunheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE : Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146:673-682, 2014.
14. Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Jeon JH,
et al. : Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study.
J Prosthet Dent, 115:755-759, 2016.
15. Camardella LT, Breuning H, de Vasconcellos Vilella O : Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.
J Orofac Orthop, 78:211-220, 2017.
16. Malik J, Rodriguez J, Petridis H,
et al. : Comparison of accuracy between a conventional and two digital intraoral impression techniques.
Int J Prosthodont, 31:107-113, 2018.
17. Sfondrini MF, Gandini P, Malfatto M,
et al. : Computerized casts for orthodontic purpose using powder-free intraoral scanners: accuracy, execution time, and patient feedback.
Biomed Res Int, 2018:4103232, 2018.
18. Tomita Y, Uechi J, Konno M,
et al. : Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plastermodel methods and intraoral scanning.
Dent Mater J, 37:628-633, 2018.
19. Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Kondo H,
et al. : Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review.
J Prosthodont Res, 64:109-113, 2020.
20. Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A : In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions.
J Prosthet Dent, 115:313-320, 2016.
21. Zhang F, Suh KJ, Lee KM : Validity of intraoral scans compared with plaster models: An in-vivo comparison of dental measurements and 3D surface analysis.
PLoS One, 11:e0157713, 2016.
22. Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Thor A,
et al. : Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method.
J Dent, 69:110-118, 2018.
23. Lee S, Lee JS, Lee KM,
et al. : Reproducibility of an intraoral scanner: A comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo scans.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 154:305-310, 2018.
24. Jiménez-Gayosso SI, Lara-Carrillo E, Escoffié Ramirez M,
et al. : Difference between manual and digital measurements of dental arches of orthodontic patients.
Medicine, 97:e10887, 2018.
25. Mangano A, Beretta M, Mangano F,
et al. : Conventional vs digital impressions: acceptability, treatment comfort and stress among young orthodontic patients.
Open Dent J, 12:118-124, 2018.
26. Burhardt L, Livas C, Ren Y,
et al. : Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques: A comparative study in young patients.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 150:261-267, 2016.
27. Ting Shu S, Jian S : Intraoral digital impression technique: A review.
J Prosthodont, 24:313-321, 2015.
28. Kim EJ, Hwang HS : Reproducibility and accuracy of tooth size measurements obtained by the use of computer. Korean J Orthod, 563-573, 1998.
29. Flugge TV, Schlager S, Metzger MC,
et al. : Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144:471-478, 2013.
30. Gul Amuk N, Karsli E, Kurt G : Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
Int Orthod, 17:151-158, 2019.