Perception of Parents Regarding Specialized Pediatric Dentistry

Article information

J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2024;51(4):344-358

Publication date (electronic) : 2024 November 25

doi : https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2024.51.4.344

Soomin Lim ^,^†

, Kyunghi Kim ^,^†

, Namki Choi

, Seonmi Kim

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea

Corresponding author: Seonmi Kim Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, 33 Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju, 61186, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-62-530-5660 / Fax: +82-62-530-5669 / E-mail: gracekim@jnu.ac.kr

†Contributed equally to this work as first authors.

Received 2024 July 9; Revised 2024 August 14; Accepted 2024 August 18.

Trans Abstract

This study analyzed parents’ perceptions of pediatric dentistry and pediatric dental specialists, identified factors influencing their choice of dental practice for children, and compared perceptions between those with and without pediatric dentistry experience. A nationwide online survey (February 15 - 19, 2024) was conducted among 500 parents of children aged 15 years or younger: 170 from Seoul/Gyeonggi/ Incheon, 100 each from Chungcheong, Gyeongsang, Jeolla, and 30 from Gangwon. Data covered demographics, factors influencing dentist selection for children, awareness of pediatric dentists, and insights on whether parents had visited a pediatric dentist. 75.6% had visited a pediatric dental clinic, and 49.6% recognized pediatric dental specialists. Among visitors, 59.5% were aware of pediatric dental specialists, compared to 18.9% of non-visitors. Furthermore, 90.7% of parents aware of pediatric dental specialists had visited a clinic, versus 60.7% of those unaware. The highest visit rates were among parents with three children, especially aged 7 - 9. Awareness of pediatric dental specialists was highest among parents in their 20s, living in Gangwon, Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Incheon regions, with professional occupations and household monthly incomes of 7.5 - 8.5 million won. Parents with experience visiting pediatric dental clinics prioritized dentists’ expertise; those without experience prioritized short waiting times. Prior experience with pediatric dental clinics significantly increased the intention to revisit and reduced hesitation. Improving parents’ perceptions of pediatric dentists enhances decision-making and accessibility for children’s specialized dental care. Professional associations must raise awareness of pediatric dentistry. Pediatric dentists should prioritize expertise and advance their specializations in pediatric orthodontics.

Keywords: Pediatric dentistry; Pediatric dentist; Parents’ perceptions; Pediatric dental visit; Dental visit experience

Introduction

In modern society, specialization in the dental field has become increasingly prominent[1]. The dental profession has implemented a dental specialist system for 21 years to safeguard the public’s access to specialized dental care. Upon graduation from dental school (School of Dentistry), individuals must undergo a one-year internship and a three-year residency program to qualify for a dental specialist examination. Specialist fields are divided into 11 disciplines, among which pediatric dentists focus on children’s oral health, motivating and educating families[2] and contributing significantly to enhancing overall oral health for children and their families[3]. Pediatric dentistry extends beyond oral health and encompasses comprehensive management, positively influencing school attendance rates and problem-solving abilities. Moreover, it facilitates holistic care through collaborations with other pediatric medical specialties[4].

As of April 2024, 369 pediatric dental clinics (13 university hospitals and 356 private clinics) exist nationwide. Since the introduction of the pediatric dental specialist system in 2008, there have been 765 pediatric dental specialists, as reported by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Despite parents recognizing their responsibility for their children’s oral health, they often experience confusion when choosing an appropriate dental clinic. This confusion can negatively affect children’s oral health. Parents require a clear and comprehensive understanding of pediatric dental services and their importance to engage adequately in decision-making regarding pediatric dental care[5].

Previous studies have examined the treatment status, distribution of new patients, and the regional distribution and status of pediatric dental clinics or offices[6], offering vital data for pediatric dentists to comprehend the present state of pediatric dentistry. Pediatric dentists must cater to the needs of patients and parents. However, existing research has not adequately addressed parents’ experiences with and perceptions of pediatric dental care.

This study explores the factors parents consider when choosing a dental clinic for their children, particularly their perceptions of pediatric dentistry and dental specialists. By understanding the key decision-making factors for parents in selecting dental care for their children, this study elucidates the necessary improvements and promotions required for children’s oral healthcare by pediatric dental clinics and specialists.

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chonnam National University (approval no. CNUDH-2024-005).

1. Participants

An online survey was conducted between February 15 and February 19, 2024. About 500 parents of children aged 15 years or younger who accompanied their children to dental visits were surveyed. Participants were included from the following regions: 170 from Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Incheon regions; 100 each from the Chungcheong, Gyeongsang, and Jeolla regions; 30 from Gangwon. Participants were recruited using an online survey platform operated by a specialized online survey company. This company recruited individuals who met the inclusion criteria and conducted the survey on its website.

2. Procedure

Participants were informed about the study’s purpose, and they provided their consent through an online consent form. Those who did not consent to participate or discontinued the survey midway were excluded from the study. The survey was conducted anonymously with the support of a professional online survey company. Participants answered voluntarily and could partake only once during the study period. No personally identifiable information was collected.

3. Assessment Items and Survey Tools

The questionnaire was designed to align with the study’ s objectives and comprised four sections.

1) Demographic Information

This section included items to investigate parents’ age, sex, occupation, highest education level, presence of children, number of children, children’s ages, residential area, and total monthly household income (after tax).

2) Factors Considered When Choosing a Dental Clinic for Children

This section comprised nine items evaluating the factors parents considered when selecting a dental clinic for their children, using a Likert scale from 1 to 5.

3) Experience with Pediatric Dental Clinics and Awareness of Pediatric Dental Specialists

This section included questions based on whether the participants had visited pediatric dental clinics and their awareness of pediatric dental specialists.

4) Evaluation of Dental Care Values and Perceptions Based on Experience with Pediatric Dental Clinics

Survey items were categorized based on whether the participants had experience related to pediatric dental clinics. For those with experience, the questions included reasons for visiting, satisfaction, dissatisfaction, and willingness to return. For those without experience, the questions included reasons for not visiting, the perceived necessity of pediatric dental care, and future willingness to use such services.

4. Statistical Methods

Data from the survey were collected using Microsoft Excel and analyzed using R (version 4.3.3), Python (Scipy v1.12.0), and SPSS (version 29.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Friedman Test, chi-square test, and logistic regression analysis were performed, with the significance level set at a p-value of < 0.05. The consistency of the responses to the nine items evaluating the factors considered when choosing a dental clinic for children was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Each factor’s importance was evaluated using the Friedman Test to determine which items were considered more important. Pearson’ s chi-square test was conducted to analyze differences in dental care perceptions and values based on experience with pediatric dental clinics. Post hoc analysis was performed using binomial logistic regression analysis for sections showing statistically significant differences between the groups.

Results

1. Demographic Characteristics of Respondents

Demographic analysis of the participating parents indicated 150 males (30.0%) and 350 females (70.0%). Among the 500 participants, the age distribution of parents was as follows: 268 in their 40s (53.6%), 172 in their 30s (34.4%), 44 in their 50s (8.8%), and 16 in their 20s (3.2%). Most respondents were parents, predominantly mothers, accompanying their children to dental clinics. Regarding educational attainment, 382 (76.4%) participants were university graduates, 74 (14.8%) held postgraduate degrees or higher, and 44 (8.8%) were high school graduates.

Occupational distribution was as follows: 277 (55.4%) held office and management positions, 109 (21.8%) were full-time homemakers, 51 (10.2%) were professionals, 29 (5.8%) were self-employed, 23 (4.6%) were public officials, and 11 (2.2%) belonged to other occupations. The most common monthly family net income was 5.5 - 6.5 million KRW, reported by 87 respondents (17.4%). The residential distribution included 169 (33.8%) from Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Incheon, 99 (19.8%) each from Jeolla, Gyeongsang, and Chungcheong, and 34 (6.8%) from Gangwon.

The general characteristics of the respondents’ children showed 730 children, with 368 boys (50.4%) and 362 girls (49.6%). The age distribution was as follows: 165 aged 10 - 12 years (33.0%), 80 aged 4 - 6 years (16.0%), 110 aged 7 - 9 years (22.0%), 86 aged 13 - 15 years (17.2%), and 59 aged 0 - 3 years (11.8%). The number of children per family was two for 231 families (46.2%), one for 229 families (45.8%), and three for 40 families (8%). The birth order of the respondents’ children was as follows: firstborn, 431 (59.0%); second-born, 259 (35.5%); third-born, 40 (5.5%) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic variables of the participants (n = 500)

2. Experience with Pediatric Dental Clinics and Awareness of Pediatric Dental Specialists

Among the parents, 378 (75.6%) had visited a pediatric dental clinic, and 248 (49.6%) were aware of pediatric dental specialists. Among those with experience at a pediatric dental clinic, 225 (59.5%) were aware of pediatric dental specialists, whereas 153 (40.5%) were not. Conversely, among those without pediatric dental clinic experience, 23 (18.9%) were aware of pediatric dental specialists, and 99 (81.1%) were not. Among parents aware of pediatric dental specialists, 225 (90.7%) had visited a pediatric dental clinic, whereas 23 (9.3%) had not. In the group unaware of pediatric dental specialists, 153 (60.7%) had visited a pediatric dental clinic, and 99 (39.3%) had not (Table 2).

Table 2.

Experience with pediatric dental clinics and awareness of pediatric dental specialists

3. Differences in Demographic Information Based on Experience with Pediatric Dental Clinics

Statistically significant differences were observed between the groups based on the number and age of the children concerning their experience with pediatric dental clinics (Table 3, p < 0.05). Ridge logistic regression analysis, considering multicollinearity among the independent variables, revealed that having three children significantly increased the likelihood of visiting a pediatric dental clinic. Additionally, the likelihood of visiting a pediatric dental clinic was notably higher in children aged 7 - 9 years and significantly lower in those aged 0 - 3 years (Table 4).

Table 3.

Differences in experience with pediatric dental clinics based on the number and age of children

Table 4.

Ridge logistic regression analysis of experience with pediatric dental clinics based on the number and age of children

4. Differences in Awareness of Pediatric Dental Specialists Based on Demographic Information

Statistically significant differences were found in the awareness of pediatric dental specialists based on parents’ age, residential area, household monthly income, and parents’ occupation (Table 5, p < 0.05). Ridge logistic regression analysis showed that parents in their 40s had significantly lower awareness. Household income between 3.5 - 4.5 million KRW was associated with the lowest awareness, whereas the middle-income range (especially 5.5 - 6.5 million KRW) tended to show increased awareness. Parents in professional occupations had significantly higher awareness; those living in Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Incheon showed significantly higher awareness, whereas those in Chungcheong had significantly lower awareness (Table 6).

Table 5.

Differences in awareness of pediatric dental specialists based on parents’ age, residential area, household monthly income, and parents’ occupation

Table 6.

Ridge logistic regression analysis of awareness of pediatric dental specialists based on parents’ age, residential area, household monthly income, and parents’ occupation

5. Importance Evaluation of Factors Considered When Choosing a Dental Clinic for Children

Table 7 presents the variances in the significance of factors considered when selecting a dental clinic for children based on their experience with pediatric dental clinics. The reliability of the survey results was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, resulting in a value of 0.782, indicating high reliability.

Table 7.

Result of importance evaluation of factors considered when choosing a dental clinic for children and the differences in evaluation based on experience with pediatric dental clinics

1) Overall Ranking

The importance of the factors considered by parents when choosing a dental clinic for their children was scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The factor “dentists with expertise in pediatrics” scored the highest with an average of 4.05 points (standard deviation [SD] = 0.94), followed by “convenience of transportation” with an average of 4.00 points (SD = 0.78) and “treatment cost” with an average of 3.99 points (SD = 0.81). Thus, parents highly value the expertise of pediatric dental staff when selecting dental clinics. Conversely, “availability of sedation treatments (laughing gas and sleep treatment)” scored the lowest average of 3.36 points (SD = 0.94), followed by “child-friendly hospital atmosphere” with an average of 3.55 points (SD = 0.99) and “availability of parking” with an average of 3.76 points (SD = 0.94) (Table 7, Fig. 1).

Fig 1.

Result of importance factors when choosing a dental clinic for children.

The numbers on the graph represent the average values of the Likert scale ratings.

F1: recommendations from acquaintances; F2: proximity; F3: availability of parking; F4: convenience of transportation; F5: treatment cost; F6: short waiting times; F7: child-friendly hospital atmosphere; F8: availability of sedation treatments (laughing gas, sleep treatment); F9: dentists with expertise in pediatrics; Experienced: Parents who have visited a pediatric dental clinic; Nonexperienced: Parents who have not visited a pediatric dental clinic.

2) Differences in Importance Evaluation Based on Experience with Pediatric Dental Clinics

In the group with experience at pediatric dental clinics, the highest-scoring factors were “dentists with expertise in pediatrics” with 4.10 points (SD = 0.86), “convenience of transportation” with 4.04 points (SD = 0.78), and “short waiting times” with 4.02 points (SD = 0.77). In the group without pediatric dental clinic experience, the highest-scoring factors were “short waiting times” with 3.97 points (SD = 0.84), “convenience of transportation” with 3.94 points (SD = 0.85), and “treatment cost” with 3.93 points (SD = 0.83). Thus, parents with pediatric dental clinic experience valued “dentists with expertise in pediatrics” the most, while those without experience valued “short waiting times” the most (Table 7, p < 0.0001).

3) Differences in Importance Evaluation of Factors Considered When Choosing a Dental Clinic for Children Based on Demographic Characteristics

The average values for the evaluation of the factors considered when choosing a dental clinic for children varied significantly across the groups classified by demographic characteristics (Table 8, p < 0.01). Differences between groups based on parental age showed that parents in their 20s did not have any particularly important factors, while parents in their 30s considered “dentists specializing in pediatric dentistry” most important. Parents in their 40s prioritized “cost of treatment,” and those in their 50s valued “convenience of transportation” the most.

Table 8.

Differences in importance evaluation of factors considered when choosing a dental clinic for children based on demographic characteristics

Differences between groups based on parental sex revealed that males considered “dentists specializing in pediatric dentistry” most important, while females prioritized “cost of treatment.” Differences between groups based on the number of children showed that parents with one child valued “dentists specializing in pediatric dentistry” the most, whereas parents with two or three children considered “cost of treatment” the most important.

Differences between groups based on children’s age indicate that parents of children aged 0 - 3, 4 - 6, and 7 - 9 years valued “dentists specializing in pediatric dentistry” the most, while parents of children aged 10 - 12 and 13 - 15 years prioritized “cost of treatment.” Further, differences between groups based on residential area showed that parents from Seoul, Gyeonggi, Incheon, Chungcheong, and Gyeongsang regions valued “dentists specializing in pediatric dentistry” the most. Conversely, parents from Jeolla and Gangwon regions prioritized the “cost of treatment.”

Differences between groups based on average monthly household income indicate that parents in the income groups below 1.5 million KRW and between 1.5 and 2.5 million KRW did not have any particularly important factors. Parents in the 2.5 - 3.5 million KRW and 5.5 - 6.5 million KRW income groups prioritized “convenience of transportation.” Those in the 3.5 - 4.5 million KRW, 4.5 - 5.5 million KRW, and 6.5 - 7.5 million KRW income groups valued “dentists specializing in pediatric dentistry” the most. Parents in the 7.5 - 8.5 million KRW income group prioritized the “cost of treatment,” while those in the income group above 8.5 million KRW valued “recommendations from acquaintances” the most.

Differences between groups based on parental occupation showed that full-time homemakers and office/management professionals valued “dentists specializing in pediatric dentistry” the most. Professionals prioritized “convenience of transportation,” while the self-employed and others valued “proximity.” Public officials did not show any significant preferences. The occupations of parents who answered “others” included production workers, freelancers, transport workers, and field workers.

Differences between groups based on parents’ highest educational level showed that parents with high school diplomas and those with postgraduate degrees prioritized “convenience of transportation,” while university graduates considered “dentists specializing in pediatric dentistry” the most important.

6. Factors Influencing Revisit Intention and Analysis of Revisit Intention

Among parents who had previously visited a pediatric dental clinic, 281 (74.3%) expressed their willingness to revisit, 53 (14.0%) refused to revisit, and 44 (11.6%) were undecided. However, among parents without prior experience of visiting a pediatric dental clinic, 59 (48.4%) expressed their willingness to visit, 23 (18.9%) had no intention to visit, and 40 (32.8%) were undecided.

A chi-square test was conducted to determine the differences between the groups concerning their intention to visit a pediatric dental clinic (intention to visit, no intention to visit, or undecided) based on their previous experience with pediatric clinics. The results revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001, Table 9). The group having previous experience with a pediatric dental clinic had a higher proportion of individuals who intended to revisit and a lower proportion of those who were undecided about revisiting. This suggests that participants’ previous experience with a pediatric dental clinic significantly influenced their intention to revisit in the future. Among those with prior experience in pediatric dentistry, 74.3%, 14.0%, and 11.6% of participants expressed an intention, no intention, and uncertainty about revisiting, respectively. This suggests that individuals with previous experience in pediatric dentistry had a relatively high willingness to return and low uncertainty. In contrast, among individuals without prior experience in pediatric dentistry, 48.4%, 18.9%, and 32.8% expressed an intention, no intention, and uncertainty about visiting, respectively. This finding suggests that individuals without prior experience had a relatively low willingness to visit and high uncertainty. Therefore, prior experience in pediatric dentistry can significantly enhance parents’ intention to visit a pediatric clinic.

Table 9.

Differences in willingness to visit based on experience with pediatric dental clinics

Among parents who visited a pediatric dental clinic, 74.3% (281) expressed an intention to revisit. Binomial logistic regression analysis of revisit intention and perceived differentiating factors at the pediatric dental clinic revealed that the likelihood of revisiting increased when parents perceived the following differentiating factors: “dentists skilled in treating uncooperative children (U2)” (Exp [B] = 1.803), “clinics specializing in pediatric orthodontics (U5)” (Exp [B] = 2.123), and “feeling better treated compared to general dental clinics (U6)” (Exp [B] = 1.812) (Table 10, p < 0.05).

Table 10.

Relationship analysis between revisit intention and unique factors at pediatric dental clinics using binomial logistic regression analysis

Discussion

This study explored the factors parents consider when choosing a dental clinic for their children and their awareness of pediatric dental clinics and specialists. The findings indicate that the factors considered by parents differ based on their experience in pediatric dental clinics.

Parents experienced with pediatric dental clinics prioritized expertise, whereas those without such experience prioritized waiting times. Thus, experience with pediatric dental clinics is a significant factor influencing parents’ choice of dental clinics. This observation provides a deeper understanding of parents’ decision-making process and highlights the importance of pediatric dental expertise. A previous study reported similar results-the presence of a pediatric dental specialist was the primary reason for parents to choose a pediatric dental clinic[7].

The analysis of differences based on demographic characteristics revealed significant variations across groups based on parents’ age, sex, number of children, children’ s age, residential area, monthly household income, occupation, and educational level. These findings align with those of previous studies indicating that parental interest in children’s oral health and dental visit frequency varies according to demographic characteristics[8,9].

Notably, male parents prioritized dentists’ expertise, while female parents prioritized treatment costs. Similarly, a previous study found that male parents with stable jobs had fewer barriers to taking their children to the dentist, whereas female parents without stable jobs faced significant challenges. Although female caregivers recognized the importance of oral health, they experienced significant challenges due to their employment status, which led to sex-based disparities in dental care access[10].

The group with the highest proportion of pediatric dental clinic experience comprised parents with three children aged 7 - 9 years, probably because parents with more children have broader parenting experiences, influencing their perceptions and behaviors. Additionally, the higher rate of pediatric dental clinic visits in children aged 7 - 9 could be related to common dental issues at this age, such as the transition from primary to permanent teeth. According to a previous study, children visit a dentist for the first time between 6 and 9 years of age because of toothache and caries[11]. This indicates that their initial dental visits generally occur in the early school years when parents usually begin to consider pediatric dentistry for their children. Therefore, parents should be actively educated to ensure that their children receive preventive care and maintain oral health before caries develops. Furthermore, it is essential to emphasize the role of pediatric dentistry. A child’s initial dental visit typically overlaps with their early school years. It is during the early school years when parents consider pediatric dental care for their children and become aware of pediatric dentistry. Therefore, it is crucial to actively educate parents to ensure that their children receive preventive dental care before caries develops and maintain optimal oral health. Furthermore, the education should emphasize the importance of pediatric dentistry.

Parents’ age, residential area, occupation, and income level significantly affected their awareness of pediatric dental specialists. Regarding parents’ age, those in their 20s reported the highest awareness of pediatric dental specialists, followed by those in their 50s, 30s, and 40s. A previous study reported that parents in their 40s expressed significantly higher trust in dental interventions and treatments than those in their 30s[12]. Another study reported that younger parents were more likely to recognize the necessity of dental treatment for their children[13]. However, another previous study reported that parental age did not significantly affect their knowledge of and attitudes towards their children’s oral health[14]. Considering these inconsistent results, the findings of the present study concerning the awareness levels among specific age groups may not be generalizable. Most notably, the sample size of each group in the present study was not uniform. The group of parents in their 20s who reported the highest awareness also had a smaller sample size than the other age groups. Therefore, the relationship between parental age and their awareness of pediatric dental specialists is difficult to generalize. To obtain more reliable results, it would be necessary to adjust the sample sizes across age groups.

The Seoul/Gyeonggi/Incheon region showed the highest awareness of pediatric dental specialists in the survey. Considering the statistics from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in April 2024, the Seoul/Gyeonggi/Incheon region had the highest number of pediatric dental clinics and specialists[15]. This suggests that parents and children in this area have greater access to pediatric dental services, which may have a potential correlation with the high awareness of pediatric dental specialists. These findings are consistent with previous research conducted in South Korea investigating the relationship between residential areas and awareness of specialized hospitals and specialists[16]. According to the result of the research, consumers in major cities (such as Seoul and Busan) had higher accessibility and awareness of specialized dental services than those in smaller cities or rural areas[16].

Meanwhile, in the Chungcheong and Gangwon regions, the awareness of pediatric dental specialists did not seem to have a correlation with the number of pediatric dental clinics and specialists. Parents in the Chungcheong region had the lowest awareness of pediatric dental specialists compared to those in other regions, despite having more pediatric dental clinics and specialists than those in the Jeolla and Gangwon regions. According to the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, the number of pediatric dental clinics and hospitals in the Chungcheong region (38) was higher than those in the Jeolla (37) and Gangwon regions (10) in April 2024. Similarly, the number of pediatric dental specialists was higher in the Chungcheong region (955) than in the Jeolla (770) and Gangwon regions (163)[15]. This indicates that awareness of pediatric dental specialists does not correlate with the number of pediatric dental clinics and specialists in the Chungcheong region.

In contrast, the Gangwon region, which has the fewest pediatric dental clinics and specialists according to the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in April 2024. However, the findings of the present study revealed that parents’ awareness of specialists in the Gangwon region and Seoul/Gyeonggi/Incheon region was similar. These results may be influenced not only by regional and cultural differences but also by the significantly smaller sample size in the Gangwon region compared to other regions. This smaller sample size may have influenced the findings and should be considered as a potential source of statistical distortion, suggesting that despite statistically significant differences between regions, the comparison of results may be inappropriate. Therefore, this finding highlights the need to secure a uniform sample size across regions in future studies to assess regional differences in parents’ awareness of pediatric dental specialists clearly.

The comparison of parents’ awareness of pediatric dental specialists across regions suggests that regional differences significantly affect parental awareness. Additionally, this emphasizes the need to increase parents’ awareness of pediatric dentistry and improve their access to pediatric dental care through educational programs on children’s oral health management, particularly in rural and small town areas.

Professional parents and those with higher household income had higher awareness. A previous study reported that parents working in the healthcare sector were more concerned about their children’s oral health and their children reportedly had better oral health[17]. These findings suggest that parental occupation significantly affects children’s oral health. Another previous study demonstrated a relationship between the higher socioeconomic status of parents and the extent to which children received the required[18]. According to a previous study conducted in South Korea, there were differences in children’s experiences with dental caries based on parental occupation. Authors reported higher rates of dental caries among children of parents working in the public service and service industries; however, a higher rate of children of housewives and office workers reported no experience with dental caries[19]. These findings are similar to the results indicating a higher awareness of pediatric dental specialists among professionals, housewives, office workers, self-employed individuals, and public servants. Therefore, parental occupation influences the level of attention paid to children’s oral health management and dental care.

Previous studies have shown that lower-income families prioritize physiological needs over professional and safe dental care, leading to delayed dental visits[20,21]. Thus, economic disparities influence access to, and perceptions of, dental services. Remarkably, parents’ awareness of pediatric dental specialists decreased with incomes above 8.5 million KRW. A previous study reported that high-income families can acquire the latest health information through the Internet, health apps, and various health-related publications, which enables them to prevent their children’s health issues in advance. This leads to the effective management of oral health using various preventive dental care programs[22,23]. Therefore, high-income families are not only financially capable of affording costly treatments but are also fundamentally more likely to maintain their children’s oral health. Thus, it can be inferred that low awareness of pediatric dental specialists among high-income parents may be because these families have high access to health management information and preventive treatments, which makes them less likely to feel the need to visit a specific dental clinic to address their children’s oral health issues. Consequently, they may believe that they can maintain their children’s oral health without visiting a pediatric dental specialist. Careful synthesis of previous studies findings led to this interpretation.

Positive perceptions of children’s oral health among mothers encourage preventive and routine dental visits, lowering the risk of dental diseases[24]. This underscores the significance of consistent oral healthcare and educational efforts within pediatric dentistry. Similar findings have been highlighted in other studies, demonstrating that parental education and awareness positively influence children’s dental visits[25]. Meanwhile, receiving specialized orthodontic treatment emerged as the most significant factor in increasing the likelihood of revisiting a pediatric dental clinic. Parents perceived specialized orthodontic treatment as a major differentiating factor[26].

This study has some limitations, including the potential non-representativeness of the sample due to the online survey method and short data collection period. Efforts were made to mitigate errors by meticulously designing the survey questions and refining the data. Future research should address these limitations by employing diverse data collection methods and expanding the sample size to include nationwide surveys. Additionally, previous studies have indicated that the number of dental clinics including pediatric dentistry as a specialty totaled 8,379 and accounted for 43.83% of all dental clinics. However, registered pediatric dental specialists were available at 317 clinics only, representing only 3.78% of pediatric dental clinics have registered pediatric dental specialists[27]. Therefore, the parents who responded to the survey in this study might have been unable to distinguish whether the dental practitioners providing pediatric dental care were specialists in pediatric dentistry. This should be carefully considered when interpreting the findings of this study. Considering this, future research could yield more insightful findings by creating a study environment that only includes parents who visited clinics of registered pediatric dental specialists. Future research should focus on increasing parents’ awareness and access to pediatric dental clinics and specialists. Continuous monitoring of changes in parents’ considerations and awareness of pediatric dentistry through long-term follow-up studies is necessary to consistently evaluate their impact. Expanding the sample size and using various data collection methods would also enhance the reliability and representativeness of future studies.

Conclusion

This study surveyed 500 parents to investigate the factors influencing their choice of dental clinic for their children, as well as their awareness and expectations of pediatric dental clinics and specialists. The most common experience of visiting pediatric dental clinics was observed among families with three children and children aged 7 - 9 years. Awareness of pediatric dental specialists was highest among parents in their 20s, those living in Gangwon and Seoul/Gyeonggi/Incheon, households with a monthly income of 7.5 - 8.5 million KRW, and professional parents. Parents with pediatric dental clinic experience prioritized expertise, whereas those without such experience prioritized short waiting times. Prior experience at pediatric dental clinics was found to be a key factor in increasing the intention to revisit and reducing hesitation.

Improving parental awareness of pediatric dental expertise is crucial for selecting a specialized pediatric dental clinic. Efforts should be made to increase awareness among pediatric dental clinics. Additionally, pediatric dental specialists should enhance their expertise in pediatric dentistry and specialized orthodontic care.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

1. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Ministry of Health and Welfare. Expansion of the specialized hospital system: mid- to long-term roadmap study. Available from URL: https://repository.hira.or.kr/handle/2019.oak/3021 (Accessed on November 12, 2024).

2. Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare. Guide to the specialist dentist system. Available from URL: https://korea.kr/archive/expDocView.do?docId=40315&group=T (Accessed on November 12, 2024).

3. da Costa LR, Zardetto C, Ana Maria P, de Araujo G, Pavez CE, Torres GR, Valenzuela IAV, de Ramos ZA. Presencia del odontopediatra en el ambiente hospitalario. Revista De Odontopediatría Latinoamericana 4:32–39. 2014;

4. Gouvêa DB, Neves M, Rodrigues JA. Integrality, absenteeism, and resolubility of specialized care for pediatric patients: a cross-sectional study. Braz Oral Res 37:E058. 2023;

5. Scarpelli AC, Bonanato KT, Ramos-Jorge ML, de Araújo Zarzar PM, Paiva SM, Pordeus IA. Information and making up a decision at pediatric dentistry clinic: a bioethical focus. Rev Odonto Ciênc 22:30–35. 2007;

6. Chae JK, Song JS, Shin TJ, Hyun HK, Kim JW, Jang KT, Lee SH, Kim YJ. Regional distribution and practice pattern of pediatric dental clinics in Korea. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 47:44–52. 2020;

7. Hyun JE. Patients’ recognition and satisfaction about the usage of sedative treatment in children. Master’s Thesis, Graduate School of Social Development, Chung-Ang University, 2011.

8. Zhao Y, Surdu S, Langelier M. Parental perspectives on barriers to pediatric oral health care: associations with children’s and families’ characteristics. Pediatr Dent 45:24–35. 2023;

9. Erdede O, Sari E, Külcü NU, Yamanel RS. Parents’ awareness of their children’s oral-dental health: Knowledge, attitudes and practices. Med Sci Int Med J11:1599–1602. 2022;

10. Setijanto D, Alkadasi BA, Nurrobi LAW, Dewi FL, Firmansyah FF. Caregiver perception of children’s dental caries and experience of accessing dental health services for their children. Braz Dent Sci 26:E3749. 2023;

11. Sanguida A, Vinothini V, Prathima GS, Santhadevy A, Premlal K, Kavitha M. Age and reasons for first dental visit and knowledge and attitude of parents toward dental procedures for Puducherry children aged 0-9 years. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 11(Suppl 2):S413–S419. 2019;

12. Rakshitha VS, Sakthi S. Attitude And Perception Towards Risk of Covid-19 Transmission Among Parents of Children Visiting Dental OPD in Private Dental Institution. J Educ Teach Train 13:301–308. 2022;

13. Guimarães MB, Kuchler EC, Castro GF, de Faria LC. Percepção de responsáveis sobre as necessidades normativas de tratamento odontológico de pacientes infantis. RGO 57:55–60. 2009;

14. Karamüftüoğlu N, Uğraş Dikmen A, Atabek D, Korkmaz Öner FS, Özkan S. Parents’ evaluations on the service delivery and communication skills of the pediatric dentists. Eur J Public Health 32(Suppl 3):ckac131.329. 2022;

15. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Searching for hospitals and pharmacies. Available from URL: https://www.hira.or.kr/ra/hosp/getHealthMap.do?tabgbn=03&WT.ac=HIRA%EA%B1%B4%EA%B0%95%EC%A7%80%EB%8F%84%EB%B0%94%EB%A1%9C%EA%B0%80%EA%B8%B0#a (Accessed on May 10, 2024).

16. Kim JE, Hahm MI. Healthcare Consumers’ Perceptions of Specialty Hospitals through a Focus Group Interview. HIRA 3:37–51. 2023;

17. Saeed K, Rauf A. Parents’ Behavior as an Indicator for Children’s Oral Health. Sulaimani Dent J 9:10. 2022;

18. Rizkia NA, Hatta I, Kurniawan FK. The relationship of parents knowledge and socioeconomic status based on performance treatment index. Jur Ked Gigi 8:53–59. 2023;

19. Jang GW, Park SS. A study on the children’s oral health behavior according to the general characteristics of parents. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 10:1049–1059. 2010;

20. Mukhari-Baloyi NA, Ramphoma KJ, Phalwane MG, Motloba PD. Association of parental factors and delayed dental care for children. S Afr Dent J 76:607–612. 2021;

21. Edelstein BL, Rubin MS, Clouston SA, Reusch C. Children’s dental service use reflects their parents’ dental service experience and insurance. J Am Dent Assoc 151:935–943. 2020;

22. Ghoneim A, Ebnahmady A, D’Souza V, Parbhakar KK, He H, Gerbig M, Singhal S, Quiñonez C. The impact of dental care programs on healthcare system and societal outcomes: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 22:1574. 2022;

23. Paunio P, Rautava P, Sillanpää M, Kaleva O. Dental health habits of 3-year-old Finnish children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 21:4–7. 1993;

24. Cademartori MG, Custodio NB, Harter AL, Goettems ML. Maternal perception about child oral health is associated to child dental caries and to maternal self-report about oral health. Acta Odontol Scand 77:359–363. 2019;

25. Badri P, Saltaji H, Flores-Mir C, Amin M. Factors affecting children’s adherence to regular dental attendance: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 145:817–828. 2014;

26. Abreu LG, Melgaço CA, Abreu MH, Lages EM, Paiva SM. Perception of parents and caregivers regarding the impact of malocclusion on adolescents’ quality of life: a cross-sectional study. Dental Press J Orthod 21:74–81. 2016;

27. Lim YW, Chae YK, Lee KE, Nam OH, Lee H, Choi SC, Kim MS. A study on the current state of pediatric dentists and the adequacy of supply and demand based on covered services. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 50:360–372. 2023;

Article information Continued

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Category		Experienced with pediatric dentistry		No experience related to pediatric dentistry		p value
Category		n	%	n	%	p value
Number of children	Only child	172	75.1	57	24.9	0.031^*
	2 children	169	73.2	62	26.8
	3 children	37	92.5	3	7.5
Children’s age	0 - 3 years	17	28.3	42	71.7	< 0.0001^***
	4 - 6 years	60	75.0	20	25.0
	7 - 9 years	97	88.2	13	11.8
	10 - 12 years	133	80.6	32	19.4
	13 - 15 years	62	72.1	24	27.9

Category		β	OR	λ
Number of children	Only child	-0.014	0.986	0.001
	2 children	-0.031	0.970
	3 children	0.103	1.109
Children’s age	0 - 3 years	-0.179	0.836	0.001
	4 - 6 years	0.010	1.010
	7 - 9 years	0.130	1.139
	10 - 12 years	0.052	1.053
	13 - 15 years	-0.016	0.984

Category		Awareness		Unawareness		p value
Category		n	%	n	%	p value
Parents’ age	20 - 29 years	11	68.8	5	31.3	0.035^*
	30 - 39 years	93	54.1	79	45.9
	40 - 49 years	118	44.0	150	56.0
	50 - 59 years	26	59.1	18	40.9
Residential area	Seoul, Gyeonggi, Incheon	99	58.6	70	41.4	0.003^**
	Gyeongsang	49	49.5	50	50.5
	Jeolla	43	43.4	56	56.6
	Chungcheong	36	36.4	63	63.6
	Gangwon	21	61.8	13	38.2
Monthly household income (million won)	Below 1.5	0	0.0	6	100.0	0.044^*
	1.5 - 2.5	6	42.9	8	57.1
	2.5 - 3.5	29	54.7	24	45.3
	3.5 - 4.5	38	47.5	42	52.5
	4.5 - 5.5	29	36.7	50	63.3
	5.5 - 6.5	49	56.3	38	43.7
	6.5 - 7.5	31	48.4	33	51.6
	7.5 - 8.5	23	57.5	17	42.5
	Above 8.5	43	55.8	34	44.2
Parents’ occupation	Self-employed	12	41.4	17	58.6	0.004^**
	Office/Management	132	47.7	145	52.3
	Professional	37	72.5	14	27.5
	Public official	6	26.1	17	73.9
	Full-time homemaker	56	51.4	53	48.6
	Other	5	45.5	6	54.5

Category		β	OR	λ
Parents’ age	20 - 29 years	0.060	1.062	0.1
	30 - 39 years	0.031	1.032
	40 - 49 years	-0.075	0.928
	50 - 59 years	0.042	1.043
Residential area	Seoul, Gyeonggi, Incheon	0.092	1.096	0.1
	Gyeongsang	0.003	1.003
	Jeolla	-0.049	0.952
	Chungcheong	-0.102	0.903
	Gangwon	0.062	1.063
Monthly household income (million won)	Below 1.5	-0.066	0.936	0.1
	1.5 - 2.5	0.046	1.047
	2.5 - 3.5	-0.039	0.962
	3.5 - 4.5	-0.068	0.934
	4.5 - 5.5	-0.056	0.946
	5.5 - 6.5	0.047	1.048
	6.5 - 7.5	0.012	1.012
	7.5 - 8.5	-0.042	0.959
	Above 8.5	-0.038	0.962
Parents’ occupation	Self-employed	-0.042	0.958	0.1
	Office/Management	-0.021	0.979
	Professional	0.134	1.143
	Public official	-0.102	0.903
	Full-time homemaker	0.008	1.008
	Other	-0.015	0.985

Considering factors	Total respondents	Experienced	Non-experienced
Considering factors	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)
Recommendations from acquaintances	3.93 (0.84)	4.01 (0.72)	3.75 (0.82)
Proximity	3.95 (0.83)	3.92 (0.84)	3.92 (0.93)
Availability of parking	3.76 (0.94)	3.83 (0.92)	3.58 (0.92)
Convenience of transportation	4.00 (0.78)	4.04 (0.78)	3.94 (0.85)
Cost of treatment	3.99 (0.81)	3.99 (0.83)	3.93 (0.83)
Short waiting time	4.94 (0.80)	4.02 (0.77)	3.97 (0.84)
Child-friendly hospital atmosphere	3.55 (0.99)	3.66 (1.02)	3.32 (1.00)
Availability of dental treatment under sedation	3.36 (0.94)	3.50 (0.87)	3.20 (0.92)
Dentists specializing in pediatric dentistry	4.05 (0.94)	4.10 (0.86)	3.75 (1.07)
p value		< 0.0001^***	< 0.0001^***

Demographic categories		n	%
Parents’ age	Under 19	0	0.0
	20 - 29 years	16	3.2
	30 - 39 years	172	34.4
	40 - 49 years	268	53.6
	50 - 59 years	44	8.8
	60 years and above	0	0.0
Parents’ sex	Male	150	30.0
Parents’ sex	Female	350	70.0
Number of children	0 (None)	0	0.0
	Only child	229	45.8
	2 children	231	46.2
	3 children	40	8.0
	4 children or more	0	0.0
Children’s sex	Male	267	53.4
Children’s sex	Female	233	46.6
Children’s age	0 - 3 years	59	11.8
	4 - 6 years	80	16.0
	7 - 9 years	110	22.0
	10 - 12 years	165	33.0
	13 - 15 years	86	17.2
Birth order of children	First-born	431	86.2
	Second-born	57	11.4
	Third-born	12	2.4
	Fourth-born	0	0.0
Residential area	Seoul, Gyeonggi, Incheon	169	33.8
	Gyeongsang	99	19.8
	Jeolla	99	19.8
	Chungcheong	99	19.8
	Gangwon	34	6.8
Monthly household income (million won)	Below 1.5	6	1.2
	1.5 - 2.5	14	2.8
	2.5 - 3.5	53	10.6
	3.5 - 4.5	80	16.0
	4.5 - 5.5	79	15.8
	5.5 - 6.5	87	17.4
	6.5 - 7.5	64	12.8
	7.5 - 8.5	40	8.0
	Above 8.5	77	15.4
Parents’ occupation	Self-employed	29	5.8
	Office/Management	277	55.4
	Professional	51	10.2
	Public official	23	4.6
	Full-time homemaker	109	21.8
	Other	11	2.2
Parents’ highest level of education	Elementary school graduates or less	0	0.0
	Middle school graduate	0	0.0
	High school graduate	44	8.8
	University graduate	382	76.4
	Postgraduate degree or higher	74	14.8

	Experience with pediatric dentistry		No experience related to pediatric dentistry		Total
	n	%	n	%	n	%
Awareness	225	59.5	23	18.9	248	49.6
Unawareness	153	40.5	99	81.1	252	50.4
Total	378	100	122	100	500	100

	Willing to visit		Unwilling to visit		Undecided on visiting		p value
	n	%	n	%	n	%	p value
Non-experienced	59	48.36	23	18.85	40	32.79	< 0.0001^***
Experienced	281	74.34	53	14.02	44	11.64	< 0.0001^***

Unique factors	OR	95% CI	p value
U1	1.393	0.805	0.236
U1	1.393	2.412	0.236
U2	1.803	1.09	0.022^*
U2	1.803	2.983	0.022^*
U3	1.627	0.942	0.081
U3	1.627	2.812	0.081
U4	1.407	0.857	0.177
U4	1.407	2.311	0.177
U5	2.123	1.113	0.022^*
U5	2.123	4.052	0.022^*
U6	1.812	1.007	0.047^*
U6	1.812	3.259	0.047^*
U7	3.118	0.597	0.177
U7	3.118	16.279	0.177
U8	1.482	0.126	0.755
U8	1.482	17.47	0.755
Intercept	1.122		0.658