J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent > Volume 51(4); 2024 > Article
Kim, Han, Kim, and Lee: Management of Ankylosed Teeth with Fixed Space Regainer: Case Reports

Abstract

Ankylosis, the abnormal fusion of root cementum and surrounding bone, commonly affects primary molars, leading to space loss and infraocclusion. This often results in mesial tipping of the adjacent permanent molar, necessitating orthodontic intervention to regain space, upright the molar, and establish proper occlusion. In mixed dentitions, patient compliance and proper appliance design are critical, as inappropriate appliances can cause root resorption and undesirable tooth movements. This case report presents a three-step treatment approach for managing ankylosis using a novel fixed appliance that uses the ankylosed tooth as skeletal anchorage. The process includes 1) space regaining, 2) extraction of the ankylosed tooth, and 3) space maintenance for the successor tooth’s eruption. The fixed appliance, comprising a minitube, double-helical spring, free arm, and resin ball, was used to regain space and facilitate the eruption of the permanent successor by correcting the inclination of the adjacent first permanent molar. Two patients with mixed dentitions were treated successfully, achieving space regaining and molar uprighting without anchorage loss. This three-step treatment is simple, effective, and produces desirable outcomes in a short time, making it a promising alternative for pediatric patients with ankylosis, space loss, and mesial inclination of adjacent teeth. The novel appliance emphasizes the importance of stable and biocompatible anchorage in pediatric dentistry.

Introduction

Ankylosed teeth, characterized by abnormal fusion of the root cementum and surrounding bone, typically maintain their existing occlusal levels despite the continual eruption of the adjacent teeth. As a result, the deposition of alveolar bone can lead to ankylosed teeth being infraoccluded or submerged[1,2]. The etiology of ankylosis remains unknown. Various hypotheses have been proposed including familial patterns, traumatic injury to Hertwig’ s epithelial root sheath, bone growth deficiencies, localized metabolic disruption, inflammation, infection, and chemical or thermal irritations[3]. The incidence rate of ankylosed teeth ranges between 1.3% and 38.5%, with primary teeth being affected more commonly than permanent teeth[1]. Ankylosis in the primary dentition most frequently affects the mandibular first molars, followed by the mandibular second molars, and the maxillary molars.
Extensive bony ankylosis of the primary molars can interfere with the eruption of the permanent successors and, consequently, affect occlusal relationships[2]. Previous studies also reported on complications, such as prolonged retention of the affected teeth, extrusion of the opposing teeth, periodontal destruction due to occlusal forces and food impaction, increased susceptibility to dental caries, and eruption disturbance of the permanent successors, especially in association with untreated infraocclusion[3,4]. Numerous treatment methods for ankylosed primary molars are available, including periodic observation, restorative treatment, space management, and surgical extraction of ankylosed teeth. The treatment choice is typically selected based on the degree of infraocclusion, the presence and stage of development of the successor tooth, and the onset time[5]. Decreased arch length is a common complication, occurring in 28 - 43% of ankylosed primary molars, especially primary mandibular second molars. When the adjacent first permanent molar tilts toward the ankylosed tooth, it can reduce the arch length as well as impede vertical growth[6]. Therefore, space management is indicated for patients with moderate to severe infraocclusion of the primary molar. Space management can ensure easier access for surgical extraction, normal eruption, and occlusion[7].
While both removable and fixed appliances have been used to regain space, removable appliances can pose challenges in terms of patient compliance and cooperation. The therapeutic effectiveness relies heavily on patient compliance to wear the appliance[8]. Ensuring stable anchorage is paramount during the mixed dentition stage due to physiological root resorption and increased mobility of the primary teeth during the exfoliation stage. Thus, more effective and stable appliances are needed.
In this case report, we described two patients with mixed dentitions who underwent orthodontic treatment with a fixed space regainer appliance that utilized ankylosed teeth for skeletal anchorage. Both patients exhibited favorable treatment outcomes, including adequate space regaining and appropriate uprighting of the adjacent permanent molar within a short treatment time, without experiencing anchorage loss.

Case Reports

This study was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Kyungpook National University Dental Hospital (IRB No: KNUDH-2023-04-03-00). The patients’ legal guardians provided informed consent for the publication of this case report, as well as related clinical photographs and radiographic images of the patients.

1. Case 1

A 9-year-old female patient was referred to our clinic for consultation and treatment of the infraoccluded left mandibular second primary molar. The patient had no relevant medical history. Intraoral examination showed that the occlusal surface of the left mandibular second primary molar was at the level of the interproximal gingiva of the adjacent teeth (Fig. 1). Although the contralateral side exhibited a class I molar relationship, severe space loss due to the mesial inclination of the first permanent molar was observed. Radiographic examination showed deficient alveolar bone height, a mesially angulated permanent first molar, and the downward displacement of the successor tooth. Ankylosis of the left mandibular second primary molar was diagnosed because of the tooth position and the occlusal level relative to the neighboring teeth. The patient consented to orthodontic treatment for space regaining using our novel appliance and surgical extraction of the ankylosed tooth.
After the application of a rubber dam for isolation, a minitube (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) was attached to the occlusal surface of the ankylosed tooth using Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Seefeld, Bavaria, Germany). The helical spring, made of 0.5 mm stainless steel wire (Dentaurum, Ispringen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany), was bent to create 1.3 mm-diameter loops. One end of the spring was then inserted into the minitube, while the free end of the spring was bent to conform to the height of the contour of the first molar such that it was continuously exerting uprighting forces (Fig. 2A). Every two weeks, the range of action of the helical spring was increased by enlarging the diameter of the loop, up to a maximum of 3.0 mm (Fig. 2B). After eight weeks, both spring wire loops were expanded to 3.0 mm and the left mandibular first permanent molar was moved distally and uprighted, thus regaining the lost space for surgical access (Fig. 2C). Subsequently, the ankylosed left mandibular second primary molar was extracted surgically, and a lingual arch space maintainer was placed (Fig. 2D). At the time of extraction, the root development of the permanent successor was determined to be between half and two-thirds complete, corresponding to Stage 7. This timing, 10 weeks after the initiation of treatment, was selected to facilitate proper eruption and alignment of the permanent tooth while minimizing the risk of complications.
Normal development and actively accelerated eruption of the left mandibular second premolar germ were observed 5 weeks and 8 months after extraction of the submerged second primary molar and attachment of the space maintainer (Fig. 3A, 3B). The second premolar emerged into the oral cavity 20 months after extraction (Fig. 3C, 3D). Periodic clinical and radiological examinations conducted over 24 months showed normal root development and healthy periodontal tissues following the spontaneous eruption of the second premolar.

2. Case 2

An 8-year-old male patient was referred from a local clinic complaining about the disturbed eruption of the mandibular left second premolar and a submerged primary molar. His medical and dental history were unremarkable. Intraoral examination showed that the occlusal surface of the left second primary molar was approximately level with the contact point of the neighboring left mandibular permanent first molar (Fig. 4). Furthermore, a moderately ankylosed left second primary molar, supra-eruption of the opposing tooth, the loss of arch length, and tipping of the neighboring permanent first molar, were observed. A panoramic radiographic examination showed that the dental follicle of the second premolar was located between the roots of the ankylosed primary molar.
A treatment plan was developed based on the clinical and radiographic findings. This included extraction of the ankylosed primary tooth, orthodontic treatment to regain the arch space and facilitate access for surgical extraction, and space maintenance. The patient, a football player, expressed concerns regarding the risk of soft tissue injury and discomfort caused by wearing a bulky intraoral appliance. Non-compliance, exacerbated by the inadvertent failure to reinsert the appliance after sports, was anticipated. The risk of extending and complicating the treatment process due to a lack of patient cooperation could not be ignored. Therefore, a fixed appliance was used to regain space, with the ankylosed primary molar serving as skeletal anchorage. The patient consented to orthodontic treatment for space regaining with a novel fixed appliance.
After applying a rubber dam for isolation, a minitube (3M Unitek, USA) was bonded to the occlusal surface of the ankylosed tooth using Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Germany). A helical spring, made from 0.5 mm stainless steel wire (Dentaurum), was shaped into helical springs of 1.3 mm diameter. One end of the spring was then inserted into the minitube, while the free end was adjusted to match the contour height of the first molar to provide uprighting forces continuously. Three-weekly followup appointments were scheduled to increase the helical spring’s range of action from 1.3 mm to 3.0 mm and to assess the patient’s oral hygiene (Fig. 5).
Three months after starting treatment, the left mandibular first molar moved distally and uprighted, thus, creating sufficient space to access the ankylosed second primary molar for surgical extraction (Fig. 5D). The wire did not cause any soft tissue injuries, and the patient did not experience any discomfort from the appliance during treatment. Subsequently, the second primary molar was extracted 3 months and 2 weeks after the initiation of treatment, and a lingual arch space maintainer was placed to facilitate the spontaneous eruption of the successor premolar. At the time of extraction, the permanent successor’s root development was assessed to be between half and two-thirds complete, corresponding to Stage 7. After 4 months, normal development of the left mandibular second premolar germ was observed (Fig. 6A, 6B). The second premolar emerged into the oral cavity 9 months after extraction (Fig. 6C, 6D). Periodic clinical and radiological examinations over 24 months showed normal root development and healthy periodontal tissues of the spontaneously erupted second premolar (Fig. 6E, 6F).

Discussion

Ankylosed primary molars pose significant challenges due to their potential to disrupt the eruption of permanent successors and affect occlusal relationships. Traditional treatment, including periodic observation, restorative treatment, space management, and surgical extraction, has varying degrees of success and patient compliance issues[9,10]. This study described orthodontic space regaining treatment using a novel fixed appliance, leveraging the ankylosed tooth for skeletal anchorage. The results of our two cases demonstrated the effectiveness of this novel method in addressing space management and facilitating the eruption of the permanent successor.
The three-step treatment process described in this case report began with the use of a fixed appliance for space regaining, which also distalizes and uprights the adjacent first permanent molars. In both cases, this crucial step effectively created the necessary space for the surgical access to the ankylosed tooth. Following successful space regaining, the ankylosed primary molar in both cases was surgically extracted, and the permanent successor erupted uneventfully. After the surgical extraction, a space maintainer was inserted to preserve the newly created space, thereby facilitating the spontaneous eruption of the permanent successor. This sequential treatment approach not only addressed the immediate occlusal and spatial concerns but also set the stage for optimal long-term dental development[7]. In cases where there are more complex occlusal issues or significant malalignment of the teeth, combining our novel fixed appliance for space regaining with comprehensive orthodontic treatment using brackets and wires can be beneficial. The degree of space regaining achieved with the appliance and the treatment duration are carefully adjusted according to the timing and necessity of comprehensive treatment.
The novel fixed appliance has several key components: a minitube for retention, a double-helical spring as the active component, and a free arm with a resin ball for the action part (Fig. 7, 8). To upright the mesially tilted permanent molars caused by the ankylosed primary molar, applying a moment proves to be an effective method (Fig. 9). The center of resistance of the first molar is distant from the point where the appliance’s free arm is attached. As the helical spring is activated, it generates a moment that causes the first molar to move distally. This moment generates a controlled tipping force, uprighting the molar’s mesial inclination while simultaneously regaining the lost space[11]. The minitube, serving as the retentive part, is attached to the occlusal surface of the ankylosed tooth using Transbond XT, providing skeletal anchorage. The active component consists of two continuous helical springs, made from 0.5 mm stainless steel wire, which are shaped into loops ranging from 1.3 mm to 3.0 mm in diameter. The 0.5 mm thickness was chosen to ensure the wire fits securely within the appliance’ s tube while providing adequate flexibility to generate controlled and effective forces during treatment. However, one limitation of this study is the lack of precise force measurements using a gauge during the activation of the helical springs. Future research should aim to incorporate force gauges to better refine force application, allowing for more controlled and predictable treatment outcomes.
During each visit, the existing loop is activated and its diameter is gradually increased. Once there is enough space for a larger diameter, a new loop is fabricated to accommodate the next size. The free arm, shaped to match the contour of the permanent first molar, ensures effective force application as the spring straightens, moving the molar distally. The resin ball at the end of the free arm prevents mucosal irritation, enhancing patient comfort. It is recommended to initiate treatment with this device during the mixed dentition phase when the ankylosed primary molar starts causing infraocclusion that impacts adjacent permanent teeth, such as space loss, mesial tipping, or delays in the eruption of the permanent successor. Early intervention helps regain space and prevent complications, especially when there is moderate to severe ankylosis with enough exposed occlusal surface for secure attachment[11].
Rubber dam isolation can be employed to attach a minitube to a submerged tooth at the level of the contact point or interproximal gingiva of the adjacent teeth using a resin curing system. The rubber dam deflects the tongue and buccal mucosa, minimizing bonding failure due to tongue movement while simultaneously protecting against aspiration of the appliance. To ensure a completely dry field, the fit of the rubber dam can be tightened using dental floss knots or wedges[9,10].
In this case report, we presented two patients with mixed dentitions who had ankylosed and infraoccluded mandibular second primary molars and space loss due to the mesial inclination of the first permanent molar. The fixed appliance for space regaining, designed with a minitube on the ankylosed tooth for skeletal anchorage and a double-helical spring mechanism, provided continuous uprighting forces on the adjacent permanent first molar. This novel appliance effectively increased the space needed for the surgical extraction of the ankylosed tooth and facilitated the normal eruption of the permanent successor. In future studies, the use of CBCT scans could be considered to obtain more precise diagnostic information for surgical planning.
In both Case 1 and Case 2, the fixed appliance effectively uprighted the mandibular first permanent molar within a short treatment period (eight weeks in Case 1 and three months in Case 2). This also facilitated the surgical extraction of the ankylosed primary molars. Following the extraction, a lingual arch space maintainer was inserted while waiting for the spontaneous and timely eruption of the mandibular second premolar. Radiographic and clinical assessments over 24 months of follow-up showed normal root development and healthy periodontal tissues around the erupted second premolars, demonstrating the successful outcomes of the treatment approach.
Fixed appliances are generally preferred over removable appliances due to several inherent benefits, such as improved patient cooperation, better chewing habits, easier oral hygiene maintenance, higher treatment efficacy, and shorter treatment duration[12,13]. The novel appliance described in this case report is advantageous because it is simple, provides effective treatment within a short duration, and yields acceptable outcomes without serious side effects, such as undesirable tooth movements due to insufficient anchorage. This treatment can be performed chairside, eliminating the need for band fabrication and impressions. The simple design makes it less bulky compared to removable space regaining appliances. Moreover, without an extended resin plate, patient comfort is enhanced. Additionally, the resin ball on the free arm minimizes soft tissue irritation, further improving patient comfort and reducing the risk of iatrogenic injury.
Throughout the treatment, no wire detachment was observed. The patients exhibited good oral hygiene and did not report any discomfort. Unlike many other orthodontic appliances, which are bulky and commonly result in soft tissue discomfort, this novel fixed appliance only involves the affected area of the mouth, the ankylosed tooth, and adjacent permanent molar, providing superior patient comfort. The ease of application without laboratory procedures is also a substantial advantage[8].
Patient compliance is crucial for successful orthodontic treatment outcomes. Non-compliance can increase treatment duration and compromise results[14]. These limitations can be mitigated by using fixed appliances, especially fixed appliances that exert continuous forces using minitubes, regardless of patient compliance. In the current study, our patients and their parents reported high treatment satisfaction, particularly due to the appliance’s compact size, which resulted in minimal soft tissue trauma and discomfort while also requiring less compliance and parental supervision. Furthermore, the overall treatment duration was short, with approximately 4 mm of space regained within 2 months in case 1 and 2 mm within 3 months in case 2, without any complications. In Case 1, based on model analysis, an arch length discrepancy of 3 mm was identified. Considering previous research that reports 1 to 1.2 mm of mesial movement with the use of a lower lingual arch, an overcorrection of 4 mm was planned to account for potential space loss and ensure sufficient space for alignment. In other words, the target of 4 mm space regaining was considered to account for the possibility of overcorrection, which would provide adequate space for the eruption of the permanent successor and establish a proper occlusal relationship. On the other hand, in Case 2, where there was an initial midline deviation due to the early loss of primary left mandibular canine, the treatment focused on achieving space regaining, correcting occlusal relationships, and facilitating the eruption of the successor teeth within the shortest possible timeframe. Although the space gained was 2 mm, which is slightly less than initially desired, it was sufficient to accomplish these primary treatment goals.
Anchorage is an important consideration in designing orthodontic appliances that aim to upright molars. Adequate anchorage is particularly important in children with mixed dentitions, since the prevalence of infraocclusion peaks at 8 - 9 years of age[15,16]. Importantly, when primary teeth are used for orthodontic treatment anchorage, local inflammatory mediators increase, which can lead to faster root resorption, and early exfoliation of the anchoring tooth, resulting in undesirable movements and the need to reconstruct the appliance[17]. Absolute anchorage can be achieved using skeletal anchorage, such as miniscrew implants or bone plates, which reduces the risk of side effects like undesirable movements that are often associated with intraoral anchorage appliances[18]. In the current study, the second primary molar was used as skeletal anchorage as it was ankylosed. No additional anchorage was required, and favorable treatment outcomes were achieved with maximum compatibility and without the occurrence of complications, such as root resorption and tooth mobility. Even in ankylosed molars, there is a risk of anchorage loss when excessive force is applied, depending on the degree of ankylosis. While a simple appliance design has its advantages, the potential for anchorage loss beyond the intended tooth movement should be carefully considered.
Ankylosed primary molars with permanent successor teeth could undergo physiological resorption and exfoliation. However, early extraction is considered when infraocclusion leads to the displacement of the successor molar, significant occlusal issues, tipping of adjacent teeth, or space loss[18]. In both Case 1 and Case 2, infraocclusion of the primary molars was accompanied by displacement of the successor permanent molar, indicating a potential risk of delayed or impacted eruption of the permanent tooth. Consequently, early extraction of the affected primary teeth was deemed necessary. Additionally, the root development of the permanent successor was determined to be between half and two-thirds complete, making this the appropriate time to facilitate proper eruption and alignment while minimizing the risk of complications. By extracting the ankylosed tooth early, the position of the displaced successor tooth was corrected, and spontaneous eruption was observed. Furthermore, space was regained more efficiently, facilitating the timely eruption of the permanent successor and promoting the restoration of normal bone height and vertical alignment, both of which are crucial for optimal occlusal development[2,19]. However, in cases where infraocclusion has progressed to the point that space expansion procedures are necessary before extraction, reevaluation from an orthodontic perspective may be required after the eruption of the second premolar. This consideration should be taken into account when planning treatment.
However, our novel fixed appliance for space regaining has several limitations. Since the appliance is attached to the occlusal surface of the ankylosed tooth, it can only be used on teeth with sufficient exposed occlusal surface for attachment. Moreover, the teeth adjacent to the minitube and helical spring are at higher risk of dental caries due to increased food impaction and plaque accumulation. Any oral hygiene issues identified during orthodontic treatment should be addressed immediately. Furthermore, patients must be motivated to maintain their oral health. Lastly, minitube cementation utilizes a light-cured resin system; thus, the risk of bonding failure increases in children with poor cooperation due to contamination.

Summary

In the current study, we described two patients who exhibited favorable space regaining and occlusal relationships following treatment with a fixed double-helical spring appliance for space regaining that uses the ankylosed tooth for skeletal anchorage and, at the same time, effectively resolved the space problems caused by the ankylosed teeth. Therefore, this method may be considered a suitable alternative in patients with mixed dentitions, at risk of unstable anchorage from primary teeth and poor compliance. The novel appliance described can achieve specific treatment goals within a short time without any complications.
This method offers multiple advantages. It is simple, provides effective treatment within a short duration, and yields acceptable outcomes without serious side effects, such as undesirable tooth movements caused by insufficient anchorage.

NOTES

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Fig 1.
Initial view of case 1. (A) Intraoral photograph, (B) Panoramic radiograph.
jkapd-51-4-474f1.jpg
Fig 2.
Treatment progress of case 1. (A) After attachment of the appliance, (B) After two weeks of treatment, (C) After eight weeks of treatment, (D) After 10 weeks of treatment, following surgical extraction of the ankylosed tooth and delivery of the space maintainer.
jkapd-51-4-474f2.jpg
Fig 3.
Posttreatment of the submerged secondary primary molar extraction and space maintainer attachment in case 1. (A, B) Five weeks post-treatment, intraoral photographs and radiographs, (C, D) Twenty-month post-treatment intraoral photographs and radiographs.
jkapd-51-4-474f3.jpg
Fig 4.
Initial view of case 2. (A) Intraoral photograph, (B) Panoramic radiograph.
jkapd-51-4-474f4.jpg
Fig 5.
Treatment progress of case 2. (A) After attachment of the appliance, (B) After three weeks of treatment, (C) After eight weeks of treatment, (D) After three months and two weeks of treatment.
jkapd-51-4-474f5.jpg
Fig 6.
Post-treatment of the submerged secondary primary molar extraction and space maintainer attachment in case 2. (A, B) Four months post treatment, (C, D) Nine months post treatment, (E, F) One year and six months post treatment.
jkapd-51-4-474f6.jpg
Fig 7.
The novel fixed appliance for space regaining.
jkapd-51-4-474f7.jpg
Fig 8.
Illustration of the novel appliance. a: The ankylosed tooth as skeletal anchorage; b: Minitube; c: Helical spring; d: Free arm with resin ball.
jkapd-51-4-474f8.jpg
Fig 9.
Uprighting mechanism of mesially tilted permanent first molar. CR: Center of resistance; d: Perpendicular distance between the center of resistance and the line of force application; F: Distalizing force; M: Moment.
jkapd-51-4-474f9.jpg

References

1. Kurol J : Infraocclusion of primary molars: an epidemiologic and familial study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 9:94-102, 1981.
crossref pmid
2. Jang H, Oh S : Ankylosed Primary Molar and Eruption Guidance of Succeeded Permanent Premolar: Case Reports. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 44:99-107, 2017.
crossref
3. Konstat MM, White GE : Ankylosed teeth: a review of the literature. J Mass Dent Soc, 24:74-78, 1975.
pmid
4. Jenkins FR, Nichol RE : Atypical retention of infraoccluded primary molars with permanent successor teeth. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 9:51-55, 2008.
crossref pmid pdf
5. Jung JH, Kim YJ, Kim HJ, Nam SH : Eruption guidance for tooth germ of premolar displaced by infraoccluded upper deciduous molar. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 39:390-396, 2012.
crossref
6. Altay N, Cengiz SB : Space-regaining treatment for a submerged primary molar: a case report. Int J Paediatr Dent, 12:286-289, 2002.
crossref pmid
7. Bang SY, Kim EJ, Kim HJ, Kim YJ, Nam SH : Surgical approach to the infraoccluded teeth by using space regaining treatment. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 32:531-536, 2005.
8. An H, Kim S, Choi N : Minor Orthodontic Treatment Using NiTi Wire Exerting Light Force: Case Reports. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 49:505-513, 2022.
crossref pdf
9. Heringer M, Almeida MA, Miguel JA : Direct bond brackets: cotton roll versus rubber dam isolation. Angle Orthod, 63:231-234, 1993.
pmid
10. Alkhatib OA, Bissasu S, Daud A : Dental floss ties for rubber dam isolation: A proposed classification and a new technique. J Prosthodont, 32:83-89, 2023.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
11. Kim WS, Kim Y, Cho JH, Oh H, Hwang HS : Unlocking ectopically erupting permanent first molars using light wires. J Am Dent Assoc, 151:857-862, 2020.
crossref pmid
12. Tang EL, Wel SH : Assessing treatment effectiveness of removable and fixed orthodontic appliances with the occlusal index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 98:550-556, 1990.
crossref pmid
13. Mavreas D, Athanasiou AE : Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod, 30:386-395, 2008.
crossref pmid
14. Richter DD, Nanda RS, Sinha PK, Smith DW, Currier GF : Effect of behavior modification on patient compliance in orthodontics. Angle Orthod, 68:123-132, 1998.
pmid
15. Shetty P, Nayak UK, Hegde AM, Jacob M : Temporary Anchorage device: an epitome of Anchorage in Orthodontic Treatment. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 4:143-146, 2011.
crossref pmid pmc
16. Wehrbein H, Göllner P : Skeletal anchorage in orthodontics - basics and clinical application. J Orofac Orthop, 68:443-461, 2007.
crossref pmid pdf
17. Quinzi V, Federici Canova F, Rizzo FA, Marzo G, Rosa M, Primozic J : Factors related to maxillary expander loss due to anchoring deciduous molars exfoliation during treatment in the mixed dentition phase. Eur J Orthod, 43:332-337, 2021.
crossref pmid pdf
18. Tsui WK, Chua HDP, Cheung LK : Bone anchor systems for orthodontic application: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 41:1427-1438, 2012.
crossref pmid
19. Kurol J, Thilander B : Infraocclusion of primary molars and the effect on occlusal development, a longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod, 6:277-293, 1984.
crossref pmid


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
Seoul National University, Dental Hospital, B1-166 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82-70-4145-8875    Fax: +82-2-745-8875    E-mail: info@kapd.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next