EFFECT OF VARIOUS LINERS ON THE POLYMERIZATION SHRINKAGE OF COMPOSITE RESIN

,; ,; ,

Journal of the Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry 2006;33(4):606-614.
Published online November 30, 2006.

EFFECT OF VARIOUS LINERS ON THE POLYMERIZATION SHRINKAGE OF COMPOSITE RESIN

조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실

수종의 이장재가 복합레진의 중합수축에 미치는 영향

최지원, 이상호, 이난영

조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실

Correspondence: ,

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the polymerization contraction of composite resin(Tetric ceram^®, Ivoclar Vivadent Liechtenstein) according to various liners(Tetric flow^®, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein/Ionosit^®, DMG, German/ Vitrebond,^TM 3M-ESPE, USA). The strain gauge method was used for measurement of polymerization shrinkage strain. Specimens were divided by 8 groups according to curing units and liners. Group A, E: Tetric ceram^® bulk filing, Group B, F: Tetric flow^® lining, Tetric ceram^® filling, Group C, G: Ionosit^® lining, Tetric ceram^® filling, Group D, H: Vitrebond^TM lining, Tetric ceram^^® filling. Group A, B, C and D were cured using the conventional halogen light(XL3000^TM 3M ESPE, USA) for 40 seconds at 400mW/cm2. Group E, F G and H were cured using light emitted diode(LED) light(Elipar Freelight ^TM, 3M-ESPE, USA) for 15 seconds at 800 mW/cm². Strain gauge attached to each sample was connected to a strainmeter. Measurements were recorded at each second for the total of 750 seconds including the periods of light application. Obtained data were analyzed statistically using Repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey test. The results of this were as follows : 1. Contraction stresses in flowable resin and glass ionomer lining group were lower than that in compomer lining group(p<0.05). 2, Contraction stresses in LED curing light groups were higher than that in halogen curing light groups, but there was no significant difference (p>0.05).

Key Words: Composite resin, Liner, Contraction shrinkage