선생 유치의 외상 후 발생한 만곡된 하악 영구 중절치의 자발적 맹출 : 증례보고

Spontaneous Eruption of a Dilacerated Mandibular Central Incisor after Trauma of a Primary Tooth : Two Case Reports

Article information

J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2021;48(1):115-121
Publication date (electronic) : 2021 February 28
doi : https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2021.48.1.115
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University
장은영orcid_icon, 이제식orcid_icon, 남순현orcid_icon, 김현정orcid_icon
경북대학교 치의학대학원 소아치과학교실
Corresponding author : Hyunjung Kim Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, 2177, Dalgubeol-daero, Jung-gu, Daegu, 41940, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-53-600-7201 / Fax: +82-53-426-6608 / E-mail: jungkim@knu.ac.kr
Received 2020 August 14; Revised 2020 September 23; Accepted 2020 September 8.

Abstract

치아 만곡은 치아의 치관부 혹은 치근부에서 발생한 장축의 갑작스러운 굽힘을 의미한다. 이는 주로 선행 유치에 대한 기계적 외상이 원인이 되어 발생한다. 만곡된 치아는 종종 맹출 장애를 동반한다. 치아 만곡은 하악에서 드물게 발생하지만, 함입과 같은 심한 외상성 손상 이후에 충분히 발생할 수 있다. 본 증례는 두 명의 환아에서 확인된 선행 유치의 함입성 외상 이후 발생한 하악 영구 중절치에서의 만곡에 대한 증례를 보고하고 있으며, 두 증례 모두에서 만곡 치아의 자발적 맹출이 관찰되었다. 첫 번째 증례는 치관과 치근의 경계부 주위에서 측방치근만곡을 보였으며, 두 번째 증례는 치관만곡을 보였다.

본 증례를 통해서 유치의 외상 이후 하악 영구 중절치에서 치관부 만곡 혹은 치관과 치근 경계부에서의 측방만곡이 관찰된다면, 만곡치아의 자발적 맹출을 기대해 볼 수 있음을 확인할 수 있었다.

Trans Abstract

Dilacerations generally involve central incisors; most often maxillary incisors rather than their mandibular counterparts. The clinical features of dilaceration include non-eruption of the responsible tooth or prolonged retention of the deciduous predecessor tooth. In Case 1, the tooth showed a dilaceration at the boundary between the crown and the root, more laterally rather than labiolingually. In Case 2, the dilacerated tooth showed a crown dilaceration with a relatively normal orientation of the dental root. In both cases, no significant space losses for eruption were observed. Moreover, it seems that unlike the maxilla with the palate, the mandibular anterior teeth are limited to show severe displacement.

From these cases, it is suggested that if a mandibular permanent incisor shows a crown dilaceration or lateral dilaceration at the boundary between the crown and the root, there is a relatively high probability of spontaneous eruption of the dilacerated tooth.

Ⅰ. Introduction

Dilaceration is defined as an angulation or a sharp bend/curve in the root or the crown portion of a formed tooth[1]. It typically occurs as a result of trauma (such as intrusion) to the deciduous predecessors and results in non axial displacement of the already formed hard tissue portion of the developing tooth[2]. The prevalence of dilaceration constitutes 3% of all injuries in developing teeth[3]. Dilacerations generally involve central incisors; most often maxillary incisors rather than their mandibular counterparts[4,5]. The clinical features of dilaceration include non-eruption of the successive tooth or prolonged retention of the deciduous predecessor tooth[6].

The purpose of this case report was to introduce two cases of spontaneous eruptions of dilacerated mandibular central incisors after a traumatic injury of deciduous teeth, and lead to speculations about the factors favoring spontaneous eruption.

Ⅱ. Case Reports

1. Case 1

A 2-year-and-11-month-old girl visited the Department of Pediatric Dentistry of the Kyungpook National University Dental Hospital, with the chief complaint of dental trauma. Clinical and radiologic findings showed intrusion and mild labial deviation of the primary mandibular right central incisor(Fig. 1A, 2A, 2B). At the time of trauma, the crown of the permanent successor was almost completed. Due to the poor prognosis, the traumatized tooth was extracted. When the patient reached the age of 6 years and 8 months, radiography showed a dilaceration at the boundary between the crown and the root of the permanent successor, along with delayed eruption of the dilacerated tooth(Fig. 1B, 2C, 2D). During the regular follow-up, spontaneous eruption of the dilacerated tooth was observed, which also showed a hypocalcification at the crown(Fig. 1C, 2E).

Fig 1.

Serial intraoral views of the first case. (A) The initial intraoral view shows a labial deviation and intrusion of the primary mandibular right central incisor. (B) At the 4-year follow-up, the permanent mandibular right central incisor with a dilaceration showed delayed eruption compared with the adjacent tooth. (C) At the 10-year follow-up, the permanent mandibular right central incisor with dilaceration showed complete eruption.

Fig 2.

Serial panoramic, and periapical views of the first case. (A, B) The initial panoramic, and intraoral radiographs showed an intrusion of the primary mandibular right central incisor. (C, D) At the 4-year follow-up, the permanent mandibular right central incisor with root dilaceration was erupting relatively slowly to the adjacent tooth. (E) At the 10-year follow-up, the permanent mandibular right central incisor with dilaceration showed complete eruption.

2. Case 2

A 1-year-and-10-month-old girl was referred from a local dental clinic to the Department of Pediatric Dentistry of the Kyungpook National University Dental Hospital for the management of dental trauma. Clinical and radiographic examinations showed intrusion and labial deviation of the primary mandibular right central incisor(Fig. 3A, 4A). At the time of trauma the crown of the permanent successor was being formed. Periodic follow-up observations were performed. When the patient was 6 years and 8 months old, the permanent mandibular right central incisor erupted and the tooth showed a crown dilaceration and a hypocalcification at the crown(Fig. 3B, 4B, 4C). Approximately 10 years after the trauma, the patient complained of spontaneous pain. Radiographic evaluation showed periapical radiolucency associated with the dilacerated tooth. Thereafter endodontic treatment was performed and the tooth was restored using a porcelain-fused metal crown(Fig. 3C, 4D, 4E).

Fig 3.

Serial intraoral views of the second case. (A) The initial intraoral view showed intrusion and labial deviation of the primary mandibular right central incisor. (B) At the 5-year follow-up, the permanent mandibular right central incisor showed a crown dilaceration and spontaneous eruption. (C) At the 10-year follow-up, the dilacerated tooth was restored using a porcelain-fused metal crown.

Fig 4.

Serial panoramic, and intraoral periapical radiographs of the second case. (A) The initial radiographs showed intrusion of the primary mandibular right central incisor. (B, C) At the 5-year follow-up, crown dilaceration of the permanent successor was observed. (D, E) At the age of 12 years, the endodontic treatment was completed and the tooth was restored using a porcelain-fused metal crown.

Ⅲ. Discussion

Trauma to primary teeth can lead to devastating consequences in their permanent successors, including sequestration of permanent tooth germ, partial, or complete arrest of root formation, root dilacerations, crown dilacerations, developmental disturbances of enamel, and eruption disturbances[7]. Dilaceration of the permanent tooth is generally the result of avulsion and intrusion of their primary predecessors[3,8]. Dilaceration is more common in the maxilla than in the mandible and the dilacerated tooth often shows eruption disorders and hypocalcifications of the crown[4-6]. In both the cases described in this report, the dilacerated teeth were mandibular central incisors; and trauma to the mandibular primary central incisor was the cause of dilaceration of the permanent incisor.

The pathology of dilacerated teeth supports the theory of displacement of the enamel epithelium and the mineralized portion of the tooth relative to the dental papilla and cervical loops[3]. When a mechanical force is applied to the primary incisor, the vertical component of the impact force is transferred in the direction of the longitudinal axis of the primary incisor; it may be transferred through the apex to the noncalcified or partially-calcified tooth germ of the permanent successor[9]. This alters the position of the previously calcified incisal matrix, whereas it does not change the remaining apically soft matrix[10].

The clinical appearance of this deformity is dependent on the stage of development at which the injury occurred[11]. Malformation in the permanent successor has been reported after the intrusion of primary incisors in children between the ages of 1 and 3 years. The germs of permanent teeth are particularly sensitive in the early stages of development, between the ages of 4 months and 4 years[12]. The formation of the mandibular permanent central incisor begins at 20 weeks of gestation. Its enamel formation begins at 3-4 months of age, and its crown formation is completed at approximately 3 years and 6 months of age[13,14]. In Case 1, the patient had sustained a traumatic injury to the primary mandibular central incisor at approximately 3 years of age, when the crown of the permanent successor was almost completed and showed dilaceration adjacent to the cementoenamel junction of the permanent successor. Crown dilaceration can result from the intrusion of a primary incisor at approximately 2 years of age when half of the crown is already formed[4,12,15,16]. In Case 2, the patient had sustained a traumatic injury to the primary mandibular central incisor at approximately 2 years of age when the crown of the permanent successor was being formed and showed crown dilaceration of the permanent successor.

In this cases, both the dilacerated mandibular permanent incisors erupted spontaneously, which differs from the outcomes of dilacerated maxillary teeth reported in several other studies, which often showed eruption disorders[6,9]. There are a few possible reasons for this discrepancy in the outcome. First, although not all factors associated with dental eruption are known, the elongation of the root and the modification of the alveolar bone and the periodontal ligament are suspected to be the most important factors[17]. In Case 2, the dilacerated tooth showed a crown dilaceration with a relatively normal shape and orientation of the dental root; these factors were assumed to have a positive impact on the possibility of a spontaneous eruption. Second, although the patient in Case 1 showed dilaceration at the boundary between the root and the crown, tooth eruption was considered to be favorable because the tooth was dilacerated laterally, rather than labiolingually. The eruption disorders have been reported to be frequently associated with labiolingual or buccolingual dilacerations[18]. As another plausible reason, unlike the maxilla with the palate, mandibular anterior teeth are less likely to show severe eruption disorders due to their limitation to undergo potential displacement. In both cases, the degree of dilaceration was not severe and the crown of the dilacerated tooth faced the occlusal side. Moreover, there were no significant space losses. Although the dilacerated tooth in Case 1 erupted spontaneously, it erupted later than the adjacent tooth. It is presumed that this delayed eruption was due to bone deposition above the germ of the permanent successor after the early loss of the deciduous predecessor tooth.

Enamel hypocalcification is the disruption of enamel matrix maturation[9]. In hypocalcification, the tooth color may vary from white to yellow, but the enamel surface is usually not defective[9]. In both patients described in this case report, the dilacerated teeth showed yellowish-brown discolorations of the crown. As the permanent mandibular incisors were located on the lingual side of the root of the deciduous tooth, the discoloration of the crown in both cases might have developed from a distortion of the ameloblastic layer induced by trauma to the deciduous tooth, such as labial deviation and intrusion, thereby leading to disruption of enamel maturation[19,20]. It has been reported that irrespective of the evidence of caries, a tooth with dilacerated crown might later develop pulpal necrosis, followed by inflammation, apical periodontitis and chronic abscess[16,21]. There is some doubt surrounding the etiological factors underlying pulpal inflammation and pulpal necrosis in dilacerated teeth. von Gool[9] reported that all the dilacerated teeth in his study appeared to be non-vital; however he could not establish a rationale behind the non-vitality of these teeth. Some studies have demonstrated that occlusal trauma is responsible for the pathosis and the risk of pulpal and periradicular diseases, especially when the teeth are poorly aligned[22,23]. In another study, the authors concluded that the dilacerated crown area is free of gingiva and thus provides a suitable site for bacterial invasion[4]. In Case 2 of the present report, the tooth with a dilacerated crown showed pulpal necrosis, possibly due to certain reasons. First, the protruded position of the tooth with a dilacerated crown might increase its vulnerability to subsequent trauma, thereby resulting in pulpal necrosis. Second, developmental disturbances of the tooth, such as hypocalcification and crown dilaceration, may enable bacterial invasion to the pulpal space, thereby leading to pulpal necrosis. Therefore, because the defective enamel and the dilacerated crown can enable the invasion of microorganisms, preventive restoration may be useful to protect the dilacerated crown and the defective enamel. To avoid potential microbial invasion when the dilacerated tooth is poorly aligned, the discolored and dilacerated portion of the crown should be removed after eruption, and a provisional restoration or prosthesis should be performed until final restoration can be achieved.

From our findings of this case report, it is suggested that when the dilacerated tooth is poorly aligned and shows hypocalcification, the discolored and dilacerated portion of the crown should be removed after tooth eruption, and a provisional restoration or prosthesis should be performed until final restoration can be achieved. In addition, it is suggested that if the mandibular permanent incisor shows a crown dilaceration or lateral dilaceration at the boundary of the crown and the root, there is a high probability of spontaneous eruption of the dilacerated tooth. Nevertheless, further studies are required to determine the mechanism underlying this eruption.

Ⅳ. Summary

This case report has described about two patients who showed dilaceration of a permanent mandibular incisor, preceded by labial deviation, and intrusion of a preceding primary tooth. In Case 1, the permanent mandibular incisor showed dilaceration adjacent to the cementoenamel junction. In Case 2, the permanent mandibular incisor showed crown dilaceration. The specific malformed portion of the tooth germ is associated with the developmental stage at which the trauma occurred. Because the bent portion of the dilacerated tooth is formed with the defective enamel, the dilacerated tooth requires additional monitoring, and occasional preventive restoration may be necessary.

The dilacerated teeth often show some eruption disorders. But, both dilacerated teeth in this case report showed spontaneous eruption. Although additional research is necessary to explain the exact underlying mechanism, it is suggested that when the mandibular permanent incisor shows a crown dilaceration or lateral dilaceration at the boundary between the crown and the root, there is a relatively high probability of spontaneous eruption of the dilacerated tooth.

References

1. Wankhade AD, Pandey RK, Singh RK, Naphade MV. An endo-aesthetic management of crown dilaceration in a permanent mandibular central incisor. BMJ Case Rep 2013:bcr2012-007956. 2013;
2. Allwani V, Pawar M, Ambhore S, et al. Permanent maxillary central incisor with dilacerated crown and root and c-shaped root canal. J Clin Diagn Res 11:ZD03–ZD05. 2017;
3. Andreasen JO, Flores MT. Injuries to developing teeth. Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries 3rd edth ed. p. 457–494. 1994.
4. Andreasen JO, Sndström B, Ravn JJ. The effect of traumatic injuries to primary teeth on their permanent successors. 1. A clinical and histologic study of 117 injured permanent teeth. Scand J Dent Res 79:219–283. 1971;
5. Maragakis MG. Crown dilaceration of permanent incisors following trauma to their primary predeccessors. J Clin Pediatr Dent 20:49–52. 1995;
6. Topouzelis N, Tsaousoglou P, Zouloumis L, et al. Dilaceration of maxillary central incisor: a literature review. Dent Traumatol 26:427–433. 2010;
7. de Amorim Lde F, Estrela C, da Costa LR. Effects of traumatic dental injuries to primary teeth on permanent teeth a clinical follow-up study. Dent Traumatol 27:117–121. 2011;
8. Lenzi MM, Alexandria AK, Maia LC, et al. Does trauma in the primary dentition cause sequelae in permanent successors? A systematic review. Dent Traumatol 31:79–88. 2015;
9. von Gool AV. Injury to the permanent tooth germ after trauma to the primary predecessor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 35:2–12. 1973;
10. Von Arx T. Developmental disturbances of permanent teeth following trauma to the primary dentition. Aust Dent J 38:1–10. 1993;
11. Ligh RQ. Coronal dilaceration. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 51:567. 1981;
12. Andreasen JO, Ravn JJ. The effect of traumatic injuries to primary teeth on their permanent successors. 2. A clinical and radiographic follow-up study of 213 teeth. Scand J Dent Res 79:284–294. 1971;
13. Van der Linden F. Some general aspects of the normal development of the dentition. Development of the dentition Quintessence Publishing Co. Chicago: p. 59–69. 1983.
14. Weerheijm KL. Molar incisor hypomineralisation(MIH). Eur J Paediatr Dent 4:114–120. 2003;
15. Tewari N, Pandey RK. Multiple abnormalities in permanent maxillary incisors following trauma to the primary dentition. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 29:161–164. 2011;
16. Kaufman AY, Keila S, Dayan D, et al. Developmental anomaly of permanent teeth related to traumatic injury. Endod Dent Traumatol 6:183–188. 1990;
17. Avery , James K. Essentials of oral histology and embryology : a clinical approach Mosby-Year Book. p. 80. 1992.
18. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth 3rd edth ed. Munksgaard Intl pub. p. 470–479. 1994.
19. Ozer SY. Dilaceration of mandibular central incisor: a case report. Saudi Endod J 1:44–49. 2011;
20. van der Linden FPGM, Deuterloo HS. Development of the human dentition: an atlas Harper & Row. New York: 1978.
21. Prabhakar AR, Reddy VV, Bassappa N. Duplication and dilaceration of a crown with hypercementosis of the root following trauma: a case report. Quintessence Int 29:655–657. 1998;
22. Nasry HA, Barclay SC. Periodontal lesions associated with deep traumatic overbite. Br Dent J 200:557–561. 2006;
23. Yaşa B, Arslan H. Nonsurgical management of a large periapical lesion in the anterior mandibular region of a patient with a deep traumatic overbite: A 3-year follow-up. J Res Dent 2:51–53. 2014;

Article information Continued

Fig 1.

Serial intraoral views of the first case. (A) The initial intraoral view shows a labial deviation and intrusion of the primary mandibular right central incisor. (B) At the 4-year follow-up, the permanent mandibular right central incisor with a dilaceration showed delayed eruption compared with the adjacent tooth. (C) At the 10-year follow-up, the permanent mandibular right central incisor with dilaceration showed complete eruption.

Fig 2.

Serial panoramic, and periapical views of the first case. (A, B) The initial panoramic, and intraoral radiographs showed an intrusion of the primary mandibular right central incisor. (C, D) At the 4-year follow-up, the permanent mandibular right central incisor with root dilaceration was erupting relatively slowly to the adjacent tooth. (E) At the 10-year follow-up, the permanent mandibular right central incisor with dilaceration showed complete eruption.

Fig 3.

Serial intraoral views of the second case. (A) The initial intraoral view showed intrusion and labial deviation of the primary mandibular right central incisor. (B) At the 5-year follow-up, the permanent mandibular right central incisor showed a crown dilaceration and spontaneous eruption. (C) At the 10-year follow-up, the dilacerated tooth was restored using a porcelain-fused metal crown.

Fig 4.

Serial panoramic, and intraoral periapical radiographs of the second case. (A) The initial radiographs showed intrusion of the primary mandibular right central incisor. (B, C) At the 5-year follow-up, crown dilaceration of the permanent successor was observed. (D, E) At the age of 12 years, the endodontic treatment was completed and the tooth was restored using a porcelain-fused metal crown.